Thursday, June 26, 2008

Supreme Injustice

Today, I stop my silence. I will speak out for the many children in this world who have lost their innocence -- those children who have been molested or raped and are consequently forced to live out their youth completely changed. You poor young ones. My heart is yours today.

The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that child rapists cannot be executed. They can be tried for their crimes but cannot be killed for destroying the mind of a young person. They can face prison time, perhaps briefly, but they cannot be electrocuted or injected with poison for shocking the hell out of an innocent young heart and injecting a poor child with their wicked little desires. It's odd, isn't it? To me, it all seems unfair.

I am a stern supporter of the death penalty. It is unholy, maybe to you, but what isn't really? What is wrong with diminishing the corrupt? Is it a tad too drastic, or is peeling away the ugliness the only way to save this world?

Ann Coulter, one of the most outrageous and controversial political commentators to date, once made a logical point in honor of the death penalty. To her, the American justice system fails each time it allows a vicious criminal to continue breathing. There are violent foes roaming the streets as we speak who have no right at all to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They pay their dues by doing little time. Courts release them out into the world almost as if to say "go! be fruitful and multiply!" The newly released rapists and molesters go back into the world and find more victims to ruin. Facts show, those who commit vigorous crimes tend to do it over and over and over and over again. So why not nip it all in the bud and send them on an express train to hell?

If you savagely beat and rape a child, you deserve to die. Period.

Here’s a snippet of what one of the great (in)justices of this land had to say:

“[we] ruled against the death penalty no matter how young the child, no matter how many times the child is raped, no matter how many children the perpetrator rapes, no matter how sadistic the crime, no matter how much physical or psychological trauma is inflicted and no matter how heinous the perpetrator's criminal record may be.”

How brilliant and comforting.

Obviously, these justices have never been raped. They’ve never been abused as children. I wonder, do they even have children or grandchildren of their own? It’s a travesty when our court system rules against an innocent child emotionally scarred for life because of a perverted adult. How can you favor someone who taints our young children?

No comments: